...Donald Trump. That's the card Carney played relentlessly, as he scared Canadians into submission, claiming he was the only guy who could save us from this threat. He reminded me of Kenneth Lay, the president of the doomed Enron Corp., who always said he was, "The smartest guy in the room."
![]() |
Our new leader. |
I get my economic advice from B, who went to 'The London School of Economics' on a Leverhulme fellowship to do post-graduate work. According to my in-house expert on macro economics, Carney doesn't have the chops. Remember, his PhD is in Philosophy -- not economics -- yet he was the guy running Finance behind the scenes for the last five years.
But Carney's strategy paid off. Frankly, however, I think Carney is as big a malefactor as was Lay, but he hid it well and it paid off. He is now the prime minister. But let's not forget who ran this country into the ground over the last 10 years. Not Donald Trump in just two months. No, the Liberals managed that all on their own. He has said he will not repeal Bill C-69, which means no money will be forthcoming from investors.
The other problem is, without a majority, Carney will be negotiating from a position of weakness and Trump will make him pay because Carney simply doesn't have the cards.
Poilievre? He's gone, but not out. One loyal MP is giving up his seat so Poilievre can try to get a seat. But why did he lose in his own riding? I doubt it was because his entire campaign revolved around slagging Trudeau and dumping the slag onto Carney. I think the voters of Carleton finally tired of giving Poilievre chance after chance, only to come up afoul of the Liberals at every turn. After 20 years, they'd had enough. He took his victory for granted, so Carleton voters finally decided they'd been losers long enough.
![]() |
The late Pierre Poilievre. |
Singh? Remember, he was elected head of the NDP purely because a large number of hitherto uninvolved Sikhs joined the party at the last minute and elected him. Then they all disappeared. Why did he want to head the party? I have no clue because any guy who wears $2,000 suits, sports a Rolex and drives a high-end, luxury car is not, in his heart of hearts, a supporter of your average GM line worker.
Maybe his career as a lawyer wasn't going so well? Not to worry, he held on long enough to secure a fat pension. Oh, and let's not forget his involvement in the pro-Khalistan movement, a semi-terrorist gang dedicated to the formation of a separate Sikh state in India. Hey, Jagmeet, you were running in Canada as head of a Canadian political party. What T-F were you doing pushing that agenda?! You can't serve two masters, but now, of course, you won't have to.
So Singh lost the race. Lost his seat. And cried. Frankly, Churchill didn't pop into my mind as I watched.
![]() |
Churchill he isn't. |
Elizabeth May? Well, what can one say about this abomination? She won her seat, but her co-leader didn't. Why oh why do the electors of Saanich-Gulf Islands keep returning her to Ottawa?! Is it a hippie thing? So she'll squat in Ottawa for the next four years -- or how ever long this government lasts.
So, that's my amateur's analysis of the election. Take it for what it's worth, but I usually manage to channel "George and Martha", as the late Ralph Klein used to describe the average voter.
Ah well, let the pundits pundit, but I think I've nailed it.