I'm talking about the drubbing the Republicans took in the U.S. midterms, which some think will chasten Trump. Nothing could be further from the truth. That's just not who he is.
Trump will simply double down in anger and he has vast powers to do so. He will continue to use executive orders and vetoes to reject anything Congress sends to him he doesn't fancy.
![]() |
| I wrote this blog yesterday and just look what was in 'The Globe and Mail' today, exactly what I said. |
I mean, what has Trump to lose? Nothing. Even the governors, congressmen and senators kicked to the curb will be unable to prevail. And if you think tariffs on Canadian goods will disappear anytime soon, I beg to differ.
Republican politicians who have cowered in silence for fear of upsetting the volatile applecart that is Trump's brain, may now band together and try to do something. Afterall, they don't like losing either. But whether it will do anything to help them, that's where I doubt it will.
And it makes me laugh to read and listen to all the "intelligentsia" who are rejoicing in the Republicans' thrashing, bleating about how everything will now flip. It won't mean a hill of beans.
So, that's my amateur couch psychoanalysis for today.
________________________
I also want to say a word about the conviction of Russell Brand for sexual assault and rape. Frankly, I think it was a kangaroo court of events and a farce about stuff that had happened 20 years earlier. One woman initially accused him -- the same woman who kept willingly going back for more. Then others piled on. The fact that it took the jury so long to render a verdict is an indication there was disagreement about whether consent was provided.
Famed attorney Mark Geragos says that the judge put his finger on the scales by often interrupting cross examinations by the defence and subtly siding with the prosecution. "That's wrong," said Geragos.
In testimony, his accuser actually admitted she had agreed to some types of sex, but not to others. Hey, in for a penny in for a pound, in my view. I mean, how realistic is it to pipe up in the middle of the party to stop something underway. Not very.
Sounds like the shellacking of those Canadian hockey players and the vilifying of Jian Ghomeshi 10 years ago by a woman who also claimed to have enjoyed the encounter and even went back for more. Frankly CBC has never been the same without him.
I wonder what Justin Trudeau -- newly minted professor at Oxford -- is thinking of all this? I mean, Brand's ex is his current squeeze and wasn't Trudeau the same guy who was accused of having sex with an underage student and then paying her a few million under the table to shut her up. Did he go to jail? No, he wasn't branded a pedophile. The guy became the prime minister!
Trudeau at Oxford??!!!!!! WTF??!!!!! That's the end of that once-venerable institution. How could they have appointed him to anything???!!!
But back to sexual assault and rape. On that file, it's always a he-said-she-said deal. That's why so few of us ever come forward.














