Search This Blog

Sunday, March 15, 2026

I know this place well

...Hulse, Playfair and McGarry, the premier funeral parlour establishment in Ottawa.  "Death is part of life, dear," my Mother used to say when she started taking me there.  I was no more than six years old.

When someone she knew died, she took me along and I remember large, quiet rooms, smelling of flowers, with Kleenex boxes on every table.  I also remember gazing at the corpses lying in repose and thinking they didn't look asleep, they looked dead.

A familiar sight for me from a very young age.

That's where I learned what you do when someone in your circle dies.  You send a note, you call, you show up at the funeral home.  You show concern.  

That's why I read the obituaries every day in 'The Ottawa Citizen'; there's often someone I know in there.  That's how I learned that Louis Huneault's wife had died.  Louis was the deputy minister to whom I reported when I worked at Customs and Excise and he was the best boss I have ever had.

During my weekly meetings with him, my rule was one minute per item.  Very smart and savvy, that's all the time he needed to make a decision.  Because they were so short, my meetings were never cancelled.  He didn't like people who babbled and prattled.

Not to brag (well, OK, I'm bragging), but I was the one tapped to pen all the cab docs and issue papers.  I could always find and articulate the issue, which, contrary to what you might think, was not an ability everyone possessed.  Instead of capturing the issue in one, succinct sentence, most people ramble on with all sorts of background and blah, blah.  Ask me to state and articulate the actual issue and I always did it.

I also wrote all the deputies' and ministers' speeches for the same reasons:  I was bloody good at it.

But back to funeral homes.  I quickly posted a condolence and then picked up the phone and called him.  He answered -- shocked, but probably not surprised.  I had done that when the late Dick Fulford's wife died; I immediately sent a sympathy card, even though I did not know her.  That's just what you do, that's how I was reared.

I think that sympathy card played a role in why I was tapped for the job of manager, Communications and Client Relations for the GST.  Louis told me he and Dick had been out playing golf and when Louis talked about who would be good at the job, Dick said, "What about Nancy Marley-Clarke?"  I got the job.  Was it because of that card?  Could have been.

Funeral homes are part of my background and heritage.  My great-grandfather, Charles Lord, was an undertaker in Brockville, when my grandmother was growing up.  Their name was "Lord" and she used to be teased: "The Lord came down to bury the dead," her classmates would chant.

Back then, the deceased was laid out in the front room of the home, which is why they became known as funeral parlours.  If you've ever watched 'Mon Oncle Antoine', a beautiful film by Claude Jutras, you'll know how it was done before the advent of commercial parlours.

Writing a condolence, I checked for others by people who worked for him.  I was the only one, at least in 'The Citizen'.  Where was Suzanne Parent?  What about Marie-Josée Martel?  Why didn't they write in sympathy?

Guess they weren't fortunate enough to have had a Mother like mine.

Rest in peace, Rachel.



Saturday, March 14, 2026

I think Cathal Kelly reads his mail

Sent this (see letter, below photo) to 'The Globe and Mail', the other day, but it didn't get in because I've had too many lately.  Also sent the same suggestion to Cathal Kelly, sports columnist.  He didn't reply, but he did write about what I had suggested in today's paper and went even further, suggesting they dump him altogether.  Here's the letter I wrote to Mr. Kelly a few days ago: 

"Dear Mr. Kelly,

"I am a huge fan and was just thinking about the Leafs.  I know it sounds insane, but were I the coach, I would bench Matthews and Nylander indefinitely.  I mean, wouldn't that be perfect?!  


That would get their attention and maybe spur the team from somnolence to inspiration and serious play.  They can't be traded and are doing nothing for the team, so why not?  I would also restore Tavares as the captain.


"Yours in admiration,
Nancy Marley-Clarke"

Cathal Kelly's column today.  Did I influence him?  Could be. 

Part of his column, saying it would be smart to trade Matthews.

Here's the letter I wrote to 'The Globe and Mail', which didn't get in:


"Dear Editor,

"If the Leafs can't convince Matthews to waive his no-trade clause, they should bench him — maybe even make Tavares captain again.  That shocker might humiliate him into leaving, but even if it doesn't, the team couldn't get any worse.


"I'm no hockey expert, but I grew up in the era of the original six, where mesmerizing stars dazzled on every team.  Matthews certainly isn't in that league.  He looks bored and unhappy every shift.  Time for him to pick up his marbles and go home."


Nancy Marley-Clarke

______________________________



Friday, March 13, 2026

I would not have done it

I wondered why the Irish Ambassador to Canada held his St. Patrick's Day celebration on March 10th, instead of on the actual day, March 17th?  Apparently, it was to accommodate the busy international globe trotting of our never-here prime minister.

In case the Irish ambassador has forgotten, it's on March 17th

Were I the ambassador, I would not have done such a thing.  I would have said I was sorry the PM couldn't attend and would he please send someone else.  But no, the Irish ambassador threw his party on the day the PM told him to.

Did I mention that this is the Irish ambassador we're talking about?  Did I mention this is the most famous day in the entire Irish calendar?  How could the guy change the date?!  That's sacrilege in my book.  

Speaking of out-of-line ambassadors, I am worried that the U.S. ambassador to Canada is a tad over his skis these days.  He has actually demanded an apology from the brilliant 'Globe and Mail' sports columnist Cathal Kelly (pronounced kaHALfor a column the latter wrote about the U.S. women's Olympic hockey team.  Apparently, Bully-in-Chief Pete Hoekstra (just my opinion) found Kelly's column insulting.

Really?!  Could the U.S. ambassador's completely inappropriate intervention have had something to do with Kelly's fewer appearances?  I certainly hope not.  You don't get to intervene in a columnist's views, Mr. Hoekstra.  This is not Russia and Kelly doesn't write for Pravda.  

Columnists are paid to express their views.  That's how it works.  Kelly is not appearing as often as he usually does in that newspaper and it better not be over this.  I don't follow sports, but I read him every day because he is simply a brilliant writer.  Maybe he's taking a holiday?  I sure hope so because that newspaper would suffer greatly were he to leave.  (He's always in on Saturday's, so I'll let you know.  Yes, he's in today.  Whew!)

__________________

Speaking again of Carney, apparently the brilliance of our economic genius of a PM has landed our economy at number 19 in the G20.  Way to go!  He's also presided over the loss of 108,000 mostly fulltime jobs in the last two months.  108,000!  Wow, spectacular job, Mr. Uh, uh, Carney!  (His "uh's" are worse than Trudeau's!)

Trump's tariffs have contributed to this disaster because "elbows up Carney" and his sidekick Leblanc haven't managed to get his promised, guaranteed US deal done.

As I have repeatedly said, if you voted for him, you were had.   



Tuesday, March 10, 2026

Harmless flirtation

That's what I'd call it, but a director of administration in a B.C. law firm decided it was sexual harassment and sued one of the lawyers in her firm.  It happened at a Christmas party -- I mean, where else?-- and Ashley Chand has effectively ruined her career.  Not his, hers.  Forever.

Ah, the innocent office Christmas party, where booze flows and tongues loosened.

Apparently the lawyer told Ms. Chand she was attractive and bright asked if she'd considering dating him, were she working for another firm.  When she objected and officially complained, the firm offered her an apology and money if she signed a non-disclosure agreement (NDA).  She refused and immediately sued the guy and the firm.

How dumb.

She has kissed her career goodbye, along with any hope of getting a job in any other firm in the province.  She has applied to many law firms, but her reputation precedes her.  No one will hire her for fear of being accused of sexual harassment while casually bantering at the water cooler.

Frankly, back in my glorious salad days, when a male colleague said I was bright and attractive, I was flattered.  Whatever happened to flirting and flattery?  Sadly, it's been ruined by woke "feminists".  And what are they getting out of their behaviour? 

Nothing.

I was subjected to real sexual harassment and criminal assault by a Minister of the Crown in Trudeau senior's cabinet, Jean-Pierre Goyer, back in 1976.  That was a case where I should have sued, but didn't.  I needed the job, I was vulnerable, so I stayed quiet, did nothing and kept my job.    

In this case, instead of laughing off the compliment delivered in public, which it definitely was, she dug in and sued.  Could it be her culture influenced her?  She is East Indian and perhaps prone to interpreting everything as an affront, or racism.  I'd wager that played a part in her aggressive position.

Girls, if anyone compliments you, accept it gracefully.  Don't sue.  It'll be the end of your career.  If you are raped, however, as I was, you will win, but it will still be the end of your career.

Sad, but true.  If you sue over a compliment, you will dissuade women who are actually raped from bringing charges.  That's the problem.

Complicated, but true.   


  




Saturday, March 7, 2026

"Ask not what your country can do for you..............

.........ask what you can do for your country."

The brilliant "Ask not" speech.

Remember that profound phrase written by Ted Sorensen and uttered by JFK in his inaugural speech in 1961?  Carney has borrowed the famous line, but changed it to, "Ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for Brookfield."

That about sums up Carney's policies.  If you dig deeply enough, you will discover that all the contracts and "deals" he has pursued benefit Brookfield -- either directly, or by way of companies it controls.  

Sadly, the media are too lazy to look into anything that matters.  They just spout government press releases and buy into the hype.  Just to make sure no one finds out how this country's finances (don't)work, Carney has not named a new head of the Parliamentary Budget Office.  

With the departure of the highly-competent interim leader Jason Jacques, Carney is leaving the office empty and cutting off all enquiries and requests for documentation it needs to do its job.  Basically, he has muzzled it.  Again, the media ignores this completely.  

___________________________

Now we hear that thousands of Canadian citizens living in the Middle East are demanding that Canada evacuate them.  Guess what?  Anita Anand is already complying, securing planes and seats back to Canada.  I'm sick of people who come to Canada, stay just long enough to get citizenship and then return to Lebanon, or wherever, to resume the life they had always led.  It's not the first time; the Lebanese are very good at this gig.  (See "Here we go again," August 20, 2020.)

___________________________

And why are we sending Dominic Leblanc back down to Washington to "negotiate" a trade deal?  He's the guy who hasn't been able to get it done for an entire year.  Just to ensure it fails, Carney has appointed former PCO Clerk Janice Charette as another negotiator.  As I keep saying, Trump operates on instinct.  He'll take one look at Charette and walk out of the room -- if he even walks in in the first place, which I doubt.

Clearly, Carney doesn't want a deal with the U.S.  He prefers to deal with China and India.  Someone needs to tell him no deals will ever come close to what we are losing with the U.S.  

American Senator John Kennedy made a brilliant suggestion:  Canada should cancel all tariffs with the U.S.  I agree.  He, a Republican, believes that would force Trump to back down.  You know, it just might.



Wednesday, March 4, 2026

Flip flop

Now Carney is claiming he supported the U.S. bombing of Iran, but "with regret".  Huh?!  What does that mean?  Either he supported the decision, or he didn't.  And if he supported it, "with regret", then he didn't support it, in which case he should not have supported it.  (Sorry, getting tongue-tied here.)

Incoherence reigns.  He may be the worst prime minister in living memory.

Another pile coming out of his mouth.  And now he is siding with Kier Starmer, claiming the move was against international law and did not have the backing of the UN Security Council.  Anytime you side with Starmer, the most reviled and unpopular prime minister in British history, you can bet you're on the wrong one.

As for international law, doesn't exist -- as witnessed by the fact that no one pays a whit of attention to it.  The court, headquartered in The Hague, comprises 15 members, 13 of which hail from corrupt countries, so, so much for listening to their decrees?  At any rate, Canadian law trumps the impotent international variety; Carney should quit quoting it to excuse his cowardice. 

As for the Security Council, although sitting on the most expensive real estate in the world, it is a completely ineffectual organization and everyone knows it.

Meanwhile, as Carney backtracks on his support for Trump's move, the "brilliant" lifelong backbencher and now Minister of Defence, David McGinty, is enthusiastically confirming it.  Folks, it's "duh" all around this cabinet table.

Carney's current position on Iran.

Carney will pay for his about-face with Trump.  He should have heeded his own advice and worked with, "The world as it is, not how we would like it to be."  And we all know how Trump is.

Get set for more tariff fun!

 


Sunday, March 1, 2026

Baffling

We're coming up on a year of Carney's vacant reign and still people support him.  Why?  He has achieved absolutely nothing, save maybe a couple of memoranda of understanding.  Do his supporters have no brains?  No ability to think?  No critical faculty to analyze?  What other reasons can there be?

Now he's off to India to.....to.....what?  India has already said they will take every drop of oil and natural gas we will sell them, so why go there?  To avoid the House of Commons, a place where he is decidedly at sea?  To steer clear of Question Period where he has to remove his self-anointed crown?  He consistently thumbs his nose at Joe Blow Canadians -- people currently struggling to pay the rent and put food on the table.

Carney is exactly like Trump.  The latter bypasses and ignores Congress; the former does the same with Parliament.  For those who automatically despise Trump and blindly venerate Carney, give your heads a shake.

My question is, why does Carney have to be the star of every trip?  Doesn't he have ministers to do some of this?  Where are they?  Shockingly, he cancelled a press conference because, "There was no time."  That was complete BS.  He cancelled because he didn't want to answer questions about India's political interference in our elections.  The headline confirming the Indian consulate's hand in the assassination of a Canadian citizen didn't help either.

Ah yes, here's why he's in India.

And there was his wife, along for the ride.  Diana, if you insist on accompanying your prime minister husband, at least put on a decent outfit and fix your hair.  She looks like she just grabbed the nearest tablecloth on her way out the door!  Or perhaps she feels looking fashionable is vacuous and beneath her intellectual brilliance.

Diana Carney's dress on arrival in India.

The reality is dragging your wife along doesn't make you look strong.  It makes you look weak.  It makes you look like you have to have your Mummy along to hold your hand. 


Genders unknown
Whatever, woman, make an effort, or stay home in New York.  She needn't have tagged along at all.  I mean, why?  And why was Champagne on the plane?  The guy's the minister of finance, why did he need to be there?!

Heard Vassy interview Champagne before he left and he blabbed a stream of word salad nonsense, after which B and I looked at each other and said, "What did he just say?"  Neither of us could conjure a thing.

Carney may be the worst prime minister in recent memory.  He gives not a hoot for this country with his fruitless, vain voyages around the globe.

Speaking of incompetent "leaders", Britain's Kier Starmer is currently giving him a run for his money.  Currently voted the most unpopular prime minister in the country's history, he just refused to allow American planes to re-fuel at a British air base, meaning they have to fly longer and more dangerous sorties to accomplish their mission. 

Britain's stunned PM
What a dumb move!  Almost as dumb as the Indigenous group in B.C. who are trying to close off the air space above the Crown land on which their reservation sits.  How brilliant of Starmer to alienate Trump in the latter's determination to rid Iran of a leader who has killed at least 40,000 of his own people because they spoke out.  As usual, the stuffed-shirt devotee of international law said he couldn't because Iran wasn't "an imminent threat" to Britain.

Frankly, Trump should follow through on his earlier musings about leaving NATO altogether.  I mean, he is getting absolutely no support from other members, so what's the point?  

As far as Iran is concerned, never mind Ayatollah Khomeini's followers have carried out many murderous attacks on British citizens on British soil.  No, Starmer is sticking to his guns, so to speak, and adhering to the impotent international laws that threaten the entire world.  And what's the response of the EU?  Ursula von der Leyen has called an emergency meeting to.....to.....hold another gab fest.

As I said, what thick, dumb moves by both Starmer and Barbie Ursula.