Search This Blog

Tuesday, June 24, 2025

Anyone with me on this?

Anyone have a husband who holds onto the TV converter like it was a life jacket on the Titanic?!  I have one of those!  

It's mine!!!

He has no idea how to operate it, but he just HAS TO HAVE IT!!  Meanwhile, I have to yell instructions -- "Go up, go down, no, to the left, go right, channel up, channel down, don't hit exit!  Hit last!  Hit the guide!  What have you done now?  Where are we?!"

Hopeless!@#%!@!!!

After an hour of f-cking up, he finally, reluctantly hands me the device so we can save an hour of buggering around, hitting buttons and settle on something to watch.

What is it with men??!!  I have also had it with people of that gender who HAVE to back into a parking space!  Everyone else has to stop and wait while some idiot backs his HUGE ALBERTA TRUCK into a spot.  Of course, he has to go back and forth a few times to get it in perfectly.  

Why??!!  So he can make a quick get away??!!!  The selfishness of these oafs is breathtaking!  

Whew, glad that rant is behind me.  Now I have to go back into the TV room and wait until I am handed the converter!

Sunday, June 22, 2025

The Security Council? The Pope?

Well, that little volcano dropped last night by Trump sure confirms how pathetic Canada is militarily.  It also makes the brouhaha and gushiness over the G7 look pitiable.  I mean, who do we think we are?

We're insignificant and we can thank every Canadian who kept putting Trudeau back into office.  He had a chance to make Canada a more serious player on the world stage and he did zilch.  Nada, zero, naught.  Just ran around the world taking selfies and showing off his farcical socks.

As for the Security Council and the Pope, they are ineffectual and impotent eunuchs in the extreme.  A lot of sound and fury signifying nothing. 

A few eunuchs wandering around in New York and Rome.

And can we hope the upcoming NATO meeting pulls something off?  It is to laugh.  This is the same gang that hung out in Kananaskis last week eating gourmet food and drinking epicurean wine, while accomplishing diddly-squat.

Once again, Carney is carting along his mother, er, I mean his wife.  Why?  Such a bad look for him and for women.  She is not elected and her presence drops the seriousness of the event down several pegs.  Sigh..........

       


Friday, June 20, 2025

Racist?!

How could a comment about taxpayer money being wasted be racist??  It can't be, but right on cue, the natives went wild when Doug Ford said they couldn't keep coming back for money if they protested every resource development the government tried to get going.

Ford has swallowed the racits koolaid.

They accused him of racism!  Then he had to walk back the comments and spend two hours in the wood shed under the switch of Chief Linda Debassige while she raked him over the coals.  Two hours!  He emerged hanging his head and apologizing publicly.

It's insane and so, so wrong.  But that's what the Indigenous have made of anyone who DARES say a word about them.  His comments weren't racist, they were TRUE!  Here's what he said:

They do come hat in hand and have for a couple of hundred years -- all the while objecting to every project that would generate wealth.  Duh!
As I said in my letter to 'The Calgary Herald', which went in the other day, you have to get the resources out of the ground and sell them to generate wealth -- wealth which is shared by the natives.  The Indigenous claim they want to develop plans together.  When have the natives ever approved of anything?  Rhetorical.  They don't have to.  No skin the game. 
This letter must mean I'm racist too!

Reflexive objecting is their go-to position.  We need to cut them off to get anything done.  But it'll never happen.

Sent another version to 'The Globe and Mail', but because of the Ford explosion, it won't get in.  The Globe is a bed-wetter newspaper most of the time.  Here's the letter: 

"Dear Editor,

"Consultation with the Indigenous is enshrined in the Constitution Act of 1982, but "consultation" does not necessarily mean "consent" and it most certainly does not mean "veto".  It is surprising that Minister Rebecca Chartrand is not aware of this.  A consent caveat also goes against the prime minister's objective to "build, build, build."     

"Canada has a wealth of natural resources, but you have to get them out of the ground and on to tide water to turn them into dollars.  The fact is that the billions given annually to the Indigenous will continue regardless of new resource development.  That means the Indigenous do not have skin in the game, as the expression goes --something which does not bode well for this country's optimum wealth development.

"I hope Indigenous leaders will reverse their automatic reflexive opposition to pipelines and instead work with the federal government to chart a prosperous path forward for the benefit of all."
______________________________________     


Thursday, June 19, 2025

Another Lebanon

There are 4,000 Canadians currently in Iran, desperately trying to get out.  My question is, why are they there?  Canada cut diplomatic ties with Iran 13 years ago, which means there is no embassy to help people get out.  So, again, why are they there?

They're there because, like the Lebanese, they get Canadian citizenships "of convenience", but keep their Iranian or Lebanese passports so they can promptly trot back to their home countries to live out their lives.  "My heart is in Iran," said one Canadian-trained doctor currently stuck there with his family.

Do you know how much Canadians subsidize a medical degree?  Thousands and thousands.  This doctor is now upset that Canada won't get him out.  Really?!  Just how much does this guy think struggling Canadians have to fork over for his own personal benefit?

This is what has happened in Lebanon over and over again.  Lebanese "Canadians" relocate to Lebanon and then demand passage out when the going gets rough.  Hitherto, Canada has airlifted them to the tune of millions.  This has to stop.  Hopefully, Iranians stuck there are not given the same free ride because we can't afford it.

(Bulletin, Bulletin, Bulletin!  Just heard that Canada -- i.e., you and me -- is now trying to get Iranians out.  Well, of course we are.  We are saps.)

Veterans are sleeping on the streets and Carney is handing Zelensky another $4.3 billion.  Billion!@%$%^@#$!%#$#^%^!  That's an outrage -- especially when you consider that there is no way Ukraine can win this personal war between Putin and Zelensky.  Listen to John Mearsheimer on YouTube.  That'll tell you what's going to happen there.  You can also get the truth from Victor Davis Hanson, also on YTube.

We have to get our own house in order, which is what Carney pledged to do during the election campaign.  That's now all out the window, as he adopts a totally new strategy both domestically and internationally.


        

Tuesday, June 17, 2025

What was she doing there?

I'm talking about Carney's wife, Diana, standing with him as he greeted G7 heads of government.  It's not like they were arriving with their wives so she had to be there.  They arrived alone, but there was "the wife" shaking hands with world "leaders" as if she were important.  Why!  This sh-t sets women back decades.  Please stop it!  She wasn't elected, we don't care what she thinks about anything.  Does he get consistently bad advice, or does he just ignore it and do what he likes?

I was dismayed at how Carney greeted the gorgeous Italian PM Georgia Meloni.  He pulled her in and kissed her.  Would he have done that if she hadn't been hot?  Did he do that with the men?  Rhetorical.  Very insulting to a world leader.

As I said, she looks like his mother, "On a good day," quipped a good friend of mine.

There was another offbeat receiving line at the Calgary airport when they all arrived.  We had:  Danielle Smith, Jyoti Gondek, Anita Anand (huh?) and the governor general herself and her husband.  What were they doing on the tarmac?  This was a meeting of elected officials -- not Royalty.  But then Mary and Whit love to crash every party going.  They even hosted a dinner.  Why?  No clue!

Here's a weird one.  When Carney and his wife arrived at the airport, they took separate limos and had two teams of security cavalcades for each.  Why did they do this?  Why did she get her own limo??!!  They were leaving from the same place and going to the same place.  Talk about carbon pollution!  Two complete squads.  Dumb.  As I said, who is advising this guy?!

Of course, the chiefs were also there because no matter where you step in this country, you're on some tribe's traditional land.  Even hockey broadcasts acknowledge it for every game.  Gawd!

The son-in-law of a friend of mine is in charge of all political and state banquets for the federal government and he was there running the food and booze show.  Frankly, I think that must have been the main attraction -- all the glorious morsels and first-rate wine he served -- 'cause it certainly couldn't have been the business they were discussing and world problems they were solving.  'Cause they weren't.

Speaking of problems, why was Zelensky there?  Apparently, Carney in a moment of lunacy, committed another $4.3 billion to him!  Was he "over-refreshed"?  Please Gawd, help us.

Nothing came of the whole, expensive mess.  Nothing.  Oh ya, Carney and Trump agreed to agree on a trade deal within 30 days, but we all know that's not going to stick because Trump changes his mind every five minutes.  The meaningless communiquĂ© had been written before anyone had even touched down, so it was all a pointless, expensive boondoggle signifying nothing.

See what I mean?  Carney has already backed off.

WTF?  I think we need to do away with the G7 -- especially as Trump found it so all-important he actually bailed after fewer than 24 hours in Kananaskis.  Gone, poofed, disappeared!  The excuse was the Iran mess, but he could have sorted that from Air Force One, which is a flying White House equipped with everything a president needs to deal with anything-anywhere-anytime -- including nuclear war.  But he split.  Draw your own conclusions.

Last Saturday we were trying to leave Calgary for Cochrane, but were held up for 15 minutes while a cavalcade of motorcycles and limos raced along the highway on their way to Kananaskis.  I counted them, there were 16 motorcycles preceding blacked-out cars.  16!  What could 16 motorcycles do to save anyone in a limo trailing a mile behind??  Nothing.  It was all a joke.

___________________________

A word about something called the 'Horatio Alger Association of Canada'.  A full-page ad appeared in 'The Globe and Mail' the other day promoting it, but I had no clue what it was?  Looked it up, it's a group of famous people who hand out scholarship money.  Who are some of the members?

  • Michael BublĂ© 
  • Wayne Gretzky
  • David Johnston
  • Brian Mulroney -- even though he's actually dead?!
  • Jim Pattison
  • Ryan Reynolds
  • Gerry Schwartz
  • Isadore Sharp, and
  • Jim Treliving....
...among others.

Weird.  Seems like a vanity project for a bunch of celebrities.  








Sunday, June 15, 2025

Reflections on Father's Day

 The magic of DNA

On Fathers’ Day, I reflect on my fathers – the one who created me and the one who raised me. As an adoptee, I had always been aware that the wonderful man who had raised me was my father. There was no other, until as an adult I began to wonder....?

My first foray into my birth origins naturally centred on my birth mother. Who was she? Why had she given me up? The story my parents told me was magical. “We entered a huge room, where there were rows and rows of cribs,” said my mother. “Daddy and I walked up and down the rows looking at each baby, but when we saw you, we just knew you were the most beautiful and happy baby in the whole room, so that’s how we were lucky enough to choose you!”

Growing up, I treasured this story my parents always recounted about how I came to be their daughter. It hadn’t happened like that of course, but what a wonderful way to let an adopted child know how loved she was. In fact, I can’t remember not knowing I had been adopted and it made me feel chosen and special.

Growing up, I proudly told all my friends I was adopted, but sometimes they could not understand that. When I was in grade four, one classmate stood up in and asked the teacher if it was true Nancy was adopted? Calling on me to answer, the teacher asked me to stand up and tell the class about it. Instead of being ashamed, as this girl had hoped, I positively beamed telling them the story of the rows of cribs from which I had been chosen. During a parent/teacher interview, I overheard the teacher telling my parents how proud they should be of the way I had handled the embarrassing situation, but for me it was a moment to celebrate.

The reality of my beginnings was far less romantic. When I did the research years later, I learned my birth mother had only been 17 when she got pregnant. The father, older and married, had then disappeared. This was back in the late forties, when having a baby out-of-wedlock was the worst shame imaginable. Today, all kinds of young women get pregnant and decide to keep their babies, but back then it was unheard of and forbidden. To do so condemned a young woman to lifelong shame and lies. It also ruined their lives, forcing them to quit school and often leave the family home.

But what about the genetic fathers? How did they figure in all this? Apparently, they usually didn’t. In my case, my mother had been sent away “to school” in another city to have her baby under the care of a Salvation Army Bethany Home for Unwed Mothers, as they were then called. Her boyfriend, had been completely unaware of the pregnancy, which was pretty normal at that time. In fact, these were pre-internet days, so the research was dogged and grinding. 

I started by casually asking my mother, a propos of nothing, which lawyer had handled my adoption. After she told me, I forged a letter from my father, asking for the file. The lawyer sent it, but there was precious little information in it – only her name and job – no address, nothing else and no mention of the father. Armed with my mother's bare bones information, I searched city directories for weeks, estimating her probable age and looking for her family. Eventually I found several with the same last name. Calling each up, I finally hit the jackpot, but it was an empty one because her aunt told me my birth mother had died a year earlier at the young age of 49.

Again, no mention of the biological father.

I was crushed learning my mother had died and not particularly interested in the father back then. I had anticipated a tearful reunion with my mother and the beginning of a wonder relationship with the young girl who had given me life, but that was not to be. Instead, I contacted her relatives and introduced myself. They all knew about Shirley’s shame; some were welcoming, but others didn’t want anything to do with me. These rejections didn’t dim the pride I had always felt in how my loving family came to be my family. Eventually I travelled to the towns and cities where they lived and enjoyed learning everything I could about my birth mother – including the fact that I was so grateful she had been brave and selfless enough to give me up. Had she not, I would have been raised in poverty instead of the middle-class upbringing I had been so fortunate to have had.

I often hear stories about how adopted adults have suffered all their lives from the stigma of having been rejected by their birth mothers. Rejected? I consider myself one of the luckiest people in the world and feel only gratitude and admiration for the young 17-year-old girl who cared for her baby for six long weeks and then had to give it away, never to see it again. 

Back then, open adoptions didn’t exist. In fact, the original birth certificates were replaced by the adoptive versions, effectively erasing the original baby from the face of the earth. Frankly, it worked better that way. Everyone got on with their lives and adoptive parents didn’t live in fear that a birth mother would change her mind and take the baby back. How unbearable that would be, always waiting for the other shoe to drop and finding your dreams of becoming a mother shattered.

Forty years passed and then '23 and Me' arrived. I sent for the kit, spit and sent it back. My genetic data came back, along with a host of other reports about what kind of diseases I might, or might not, contract. Then one day, the magic of DNA appeared in my message box. "Hi, apparently we are half sisters," it read. Flabbergasted, I checked the latest report and there she was -- a woman who shares more than 30 percent of DNA with me. "Half sister" was the identifer. Having had no sisters and one adopted brother, I immediately learned I had five sisters and two brothers.

Wow! Then the biological floodgates opened. I am now the eldest of eight offspring of the gentleman who sired me. To say it was overwhelming would be an understatement. To say that a tearful family reunion ensued would be untrue. Upsetting a family apple cart is not always welcome and my existence apparently overturned a long-established sibling pecking order.  Some sisters, nephews and nieces reacted warmly; others I haven't heard from at all.

But you know what? It doesn't matter a hoot. I am grateful to my biological father and now know from whence come many of my attributes and shortcomings. The sister I am now closest to is the youngest, also a mistake she tells me. We bookend the lineage. When I look at my own children and grandchildren, I give thanks for being a "mistake". Without this happy accident, none of us would be around. This is an existential question I grapple with when asked if I am pro-choice, for example. That is now unanswerable.

So, as Father's Day rolls around, I give thanks to two fathers and leave the philosophical riddles to others.

Thomas Raymond Griffith, one of the finest men you'd ever have known.

My birth father, Billy Doyle, who I never met.





Thursday, June 12, 2025

The "Selfie Yacht"

Someone should commit the gormless Greta Thunberg to a psychiatric hospital.  Her parents should have been charged with child abuse years ago, when they first unleashed her into the public thoroughfare.

Her latest stunt, sailing a protest boat into Gaza to protest the war, was de-railed by Israel when they boarded the illegal vessel, escorted the crew off and deported them all forthwith.  That was absolutely the right call.  The Israelis called it a "selfie yacht", which was a brilliant description.  Frankly, her entire life has been one big selfie.

Stupidly wearing a Keyfiha in support of Palestinians.

She is now 22 years old, but still shows the effects of autism and her other spectrum disorders.  It's all so pathetic.  It's a good thing she was intercepted before she got to Gaza because if Hamas had gotten a look at her in her revealing short shorts and top, she would have suffered a fate far worse because that rabid Muslim gang prefers their women covered in full burkas.

___________________________

A word about Sly Stone.  I was at the 12-hour concert in Varsity Stadium in Toronto in 1969.  John Lennon, The Doors, Chuck Berry, Alice Cooper were among the performers and so were 'Sly and the Family Stone'.  Here's what Wikipedia says:

The Toronto Rock and Roll Revival was held at Varsity Stadium, at the University of Toronto with an audience of over 20,000. The Performing were Whiskey HowlBo DiddleyChicagoJunior Walker and the All StarsTony Joe WhiteAlice CooperChuck BerryCat Mother and the All Night News BoysJerry Lee LewisGene VincentLittle Richard, Milkwood (Toronto-based Polydor recording artists),  Doug Kershaw, Sly and the Family Stone and The DoorsKim Fowley was listed as the Master of Ceremonies.  John Lennon said that "supposedly the Doors were top of the bill".  Screaming Lord Sutch was later added to the bill, as was the Toronto area band Flapping.  Prior to the addition of Flapping, the only local band on the bill was Whiskey Howl. 

The poster for the festival.  It was amazing!


I was sitting on a blanket with my cousin and a few others when Sly came waltzing in with his entourage.  He stopped, talked to us and grabbed my hand.  "Come on, girl!" he said, as he pulled me along.  I started to go with him, but then my Mother's voice kicked in and her built-in harm avoidance lectures prevailed.  I dropped his hand and went back to my friends.

Learning of his death, I thought back on that moment.  What if I had gone along?  I noticed another girl went with him, as he walked toward the stage.  In spite of all my adventures, I remain a fairly conservative girl at heart.

Man, that was a great concert!

______________________________

Can't let this go.  There is no way Meghan Markel was pregnant.  She had to pretend she was because using a surrogate would have nullified her children being in the line of succession; they would have had no claim to Royalty.    

Anyone else seen the disgusting video of her dancing?  Harry should hang his head in shame for marrying this low-class disaster from 'The Hood'.  His grandmother was the Queen, for Gawd's sake!  His father is the King and his brother is the Prince of Wales.  What is wrong with him!?  I think he may have been switched at birth because Royal genes are completely absent in this disaster.

This bump is not a part of her body.  Looks like she stuffed a bunch of paper under her dress.  It actually moves up and down on its own!  No, folks, she was not pregnant.  

  









Saturday, June 7, 2025

8,820

That's roughly how many kilometres I've swum just since I got back into the pool 25 years ago.  8,820!!!!!!  It's only 7,444 from St. John's to Victoria, so I've swum further than the length of the whole country!

I find that hard to believe, but I just did the math.  That's a lot of swimming!  For years, I did the Lake Windermere 2K Open Water Swim, but haven't for the last few because they moved the date up and it was just too cold for me without a wet suit.  Hey, I'm not going to buy a wet suit for one swim a year!  (This picture isn't me, but it gives you an idea of that beautiful lake.)  

Lake Windermere swim.  The lake is a tributary of the mighty Columbia River, so it's quite a thrill swimming it!

This is me pushing off, with my trusty Swim Buddy.  Belted around your waist, it just bobs along and is a handy safety device, if you ever need one.  I haven't, but it's always there.

Just thought I'd record my stats so they will be in volume 14 of my blog when I next publish one for my grands to read -- if they ever get around to doing so when I'm gone.  

Am I impressed with myself?  You betcha! 


Friday, June 6, 2025

No wonder they were agog

All the premiers -- except Eby, who was off in Asia doing something-or-other irrelevant-- raved about the meeting with Carney.  Even Danielle Smith was optimistic.  I wonder why? 

It must have been because he is still hiding his Trojan Horse green agenda.  Has to be.  Either that, or he lied to their faces about what he plans to do.  Or not do.  At least Trudeau was an assh-le to their faces.  Carney is professionally more smarmy and deceptive.  Ah yes, many years in the velvet and duplicitous boardrooms of bankers...  

His big promise is to eliminate inter-provincial trade barriers.  Has he not noticed that PMs have been promising that for decades?  Has he not noticed it can't be done?  The hundreds of provincial regulatory and licencing bodies will see to that.  Their self interest will override any attempts to dismantle them.  Quebec will never ever do away with its supply "management", aka price fixing, in the dairy and egg industries. 

So, that's gone.

His other biggie is to immediately build projects that are in the national interest.  The coffee cups hadn't even been cleared away from the conference room before Assembly of First Nations chief, Cindy Nepinak, took to the airwaves and fired off a letter to Carney claiming that any proposed project was subject to treaty rights and lots-and-lots-and-lots of consultation with the Indigenous.

Here's the rub:  There are about 450 native bands across Canada.  Each one has a hereditary chief and an elected one, so that's almost a thousand people to "consult" with.  Nepinak thinks she speaks for all natives.  She doesn't.  Each chief will have his/her own agenda, so that puts the kibosh on any project getting a green light.  Forget about it.

All the separate agendas ruining any consultation with the natives.

The natives think that "consultation" is a synonym for "veto".  It isn't, but it might as well be.  As I keep saying, you can't get native buy in for anything because they have no skin in the game; they get their billions whether a project goes through or it doesn't.  So, Mark, you're stuck with announcements and pronouncements, but action will not follow.      

The other wake-up call was Carney's losing his first vote in the Commons.  He was asked to table a budget.  The motion passed, but he will ignore it and do whatever he wants.  There is so much skullduggery going on with this guy.  As I have said, he is a Laurentian elitist and a WEFer to the core and couldn't give a toss about Canada.  I mean, the guy's a billionaire, he doesn't need the gig!

__________________________

A word about Haiti.  The current president is planning a trip to Canada to ask for more money.  As if we haven't given that country enough!  Billions!  And where has it gone?  Into the pockets of criminals and gangs.  Trump has that country's number.  That's why he's put it on his list of people banned from entering Canada.  What does Canada do?  We keep giving money to criminal countries and failed states on the list!  It's insane.

It better stop now.  We'll see.  


Wednesday, June 4, 2025

Same old, same old

I wrote this letter to 'Globe and Mail' columnist Campbell Clark.  In the past, he has replied, but not this time.  Here it is:

Dear Mr. Clark,

I was going to write a letter to the editor, but I have just had a couple published and thus it would be too soon to have another.  However, I always read your take on events and today's is excellent.  What I would question is the matter of getting a pipeline built anywhere in this country.   

You write that a pipeline proposal, "might not get through the gauntlet of opposition and legal challenges....."  In my view, based on past experiences, "might" should be replaced with "will".  The main opposition, as always, will come from the Indigenous.  Regardless of merit, no proposal can get through anywhere, thanks to their baked in opposition to anything that crosses what they consider "unceded" territory.

Right underneath your column is a piece about First Nations protesting the Ontario mining bill, so that's the problem right there.  What the Indigenous can't seem to understand is that the money given them comes from our vast natural resources, i.e., oil and gas.  But we can't convert it into money if we can't get it out of the ground and on to tide water.  With nothing to lose, First Nations leaders seem to protest for protest's sake.  Anything and everything.  Money will flow to them regardless of what is built, or not.

Cindy Woodhouse Nepinak is already writing to Prime Minister Carney objecting to projects that haven't even been planned yet.  Chief Clarence Louie, of the Osoyoos Band, is one of the few leaders who understands this and works cooperatively with other levels of government and the private sector to make things happen.  Woe betide the Canadian economy, is all I can say.  

As for Mr. Carney's talk, it is interesting to note that his new chief of staff, Marc-AndrĂ© Blanchard, is also a net zero enthusiast who has spent his entire career in the pursuit of the same goals as Mr. Carney; so has the latter's wife.  Between Mr. Blanchard and Carney household "pillow talk", I would not hold my breath waiting for any sensible solutions.  

Unfortunately, no journalist seems to point to the uncomfortable realities facing Canada in the form of chronic Indigenous opposition and the effects of inter-personal relationships among leaders.

Yours sincerely,
Nancy Marley-Clarke
Cochrane, Alberta

_________________

As I say, the natives are already objecting to anything and everything -- even before they see any actual plan.  

Sunday, June 1, 2025

An "energy powerhouse"

This is what we still need to fuel our economy -- and that of the rest of Canada.

That's what Carney said he wants Canada to be, "in all respects".  But notice he didn't say in what kind of energy.  That's because he is a net-zero fanatic -- a fact he kept hidden during the election.  And since Canadians are for the most part ignorant and ill-read, they bought it.

The key phrase here is, "in all respects" and we know what that means.  Ladies and gentlemen, we've been had.

All you had to do was google him -- and his equally-green fanatical wife -- and you'd quickly have learned that his environmental agenda is one big Trojan Horse just whinnying to be unleashed.  In the process, he will do severe damage to our economy -- especially to the Western oil and gas sector, which funds the entire country.  Duh!

You will note that his new chief of staff, Marc-André Blanchard, is also a net-zero zealot, so that is another indication of where Carney wants to take Canada's main financial cash cow, i.e., into the financial dumpster.

Allo, Quebec, are you listening?  We in Alberta float your entire economic boat!

With apologies and thanks to Tim McMillan, former president of the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers, from whom I am lifting a few ideas, here is what Carney must do:

  • Tell the world there is a business case for Canadian LNG and approve the LNG Canada Project, Ksi Lisims LNG and Woodfibre projects right now;
  • Build pipelines to move natural gas and oil safely across the country because without them, our reserves are just another wasted Canadian opportunity in our quest to becoming the energy superpower to which Carney aspires;
  • Scrap the cap on our natural gas and oil industry immediately to clear the way for currently-hesitant investors to get going;
  • Fix the broken approval system and get rid of C-69 -- the "no more pipelines" bill.  Ten years to a "no" is not a process, it's paralysis;
  • Be careful with carbon taxes; they are anchors to our economy.  Ridiculously, Carney committed to raising the price for large industries -- another poison pill during an economic crisis;
  • Send clear signals to investors that we support the responsible development of natural gas and oil and are open for business; and
  • Ignore the activists -- and that includes the destructive Indigenous.  We can no longer allow them to dictate Canada's energy and environmental policy.  Too much has already been lost and too much is at stake to allow the continued stonewalling of big Canadian projects.
That's what he needs to do, but I bet he won't.  We can't survive Carney's net-zero agenda because it cannot be reconciled with growing -- or even simply sustaining -- existing hydrocarbon production in this country.

Thanks to the Liberals, we have endured a decade of economic stagnation because of the obstruction of hydrocarbon production by the lunatic lefties.  Emission caps are essentially production caps.  Carney must remove the self-destructive limits on the development of our most important resource.

If you suspect I am now an enlightened Albertan on this file, you would be correct.