Search This Blog

Saturday, March 11, 2023

Wonderful take on Beechwood

This is from Bruce Deachman, Ottawa Citizen columnist, and it's a fascinating look at Ottawa's famous Beechwood Cemetery.  I'm going to blog about my family's ties to Beechwood, where B and I will be laid, but this gives the big picture:

______________________________


Some of the headstones at Beechwood Cemetery, particularly in the older military section, are almost completely covered in snow these days, the names of those interred below them temporarily hidden from view.

But winter hasn’t completely won. There are indentations in the snow around each marker, as the sun warms the stones and the reflected heat melts the snow around them. If you squint your imagination a little, it’s not difficult to picture the stories of those long dead souls freeing themselves for our benefit.

Beechwood turns 150 years old this year, and it’s worth reflecting on that, too. Far from simply a place to house the departed, it is a repository of the lives and stories of close to 85,000 people scattered throughout the cemetery’s 160 acres. They are the threads that made up the fabric of Ottawa. The statesmen and stateswomen are here, true, but so are the rogues, the “unfortunates,” the friendless. It’s a living, changing testament, with new stories added all the time and old ones occasionally amended. It’s full of tradition, history, poignancy and, sometimes, humour. In many respects, it’s a public library with fresh air.

Many of Ottawa’s founders and builders are here that I wonder if one could faithfully recreate a map of the city’s streets based on the headstone names: Booth, MacLaren, Besserer, Rochester, Bronson, Featherston, Fisher, Gilmour, Hopewell, Lyon, Powell, Holland and Slater are only a few among them. (Sir Wilfrid Laurier calls the adjacent Notre Dame cemetery home now, a not-insignificant hole in the map.)

Meanwhile, there has to be a full cord’s worth of lumbermen buried here, and more than enough prominent politicians to start a debating club, including Sir Robert Borden, Marion and Paul Dewar, Tommy Douglas and Andrew Haydon, with former governor general Ray Hnatyshyn available to moderate.

On the topic of debates, one can only imagine the spectral discussions that might occur here between the likes of Nicholas Flood Davin, Duncan Campbell Scott and Peter Henderson Bryce — architect, advocate and whistleblower, respectively, of Canada’s residential schools. If you don’t know their stories, I urge you to attend one of Beechwood’s Reconciliation tours (June 11, July 16 and Aug. 20).

As home to our national military cemetery, Beechwood boasts generals and privates and every rank in between. Lt. Alexis H. Helmer, whose death inspired Maj. John McCrae’s war poem In Flanders Fields, is memorialized at his family’s plot here. I like to come here on Remembrance Day, hours before the official ceremony begins, and ask visiting family members to tell me about their loved ones buried here.

But the Who’s Who list is only one aspect of Beechwood’s attraction. You’ll also find lesser-known stories and relationships that, together, etch some kind of understanding of humanity. Detective Thomas Stoneman, the first Ottawa police officer killed in the line of duty, is buried at Beechwood, as is his killer, Eugene Larment, the last person hanged in Ottawa.

The flat markers of Rosa Shaw (1895-1981) and Bettie Cole (1908-1989) also fascinate and draw me. Shaw was the first women’s pages editor at the Montreal Gazette and a champion and mentor to young female journalists. She threw lavish parties, drove around town in a convertible roadster and, according to former CBC journalist and Senator Betty Kennedy, was in her heyday the “best-heeled woman in Ottawa.” Cole, meanwhile, according to her marker, was the first “girl journalist” on the men’s general staff at the Ottawa Citizen. 

The pair lived together in numerous houses in Sandy Hill in the 1940s and ‘50s before moving to Cumberland in the mid-1950s, and then to Orleans in the ‘70s. They reportedly had a falling out, and when Shaw died in 1981, only three people attended her burial. Cole was not one of them. Today, though, the two are buried five plots apart, perhaps mirroring their close but ultimately estranged relationship. Their headstones, identical in style, were paid for by Cole. If Facebook had been around then, I suspect each would have listed her relationship status as “It’s complicated.”

Elsewhere at Beechwood, the institutional group plots of the Protestant Orphans Home, the Protestant Home for the Aged, and the Home for Friendless Women, all of which opened in Ottawa in the latter half of the 19th century, were once just that: institutional, without names of those buried there. But in 2013, thanks to the largesse of an anonymous donor, a plaque was erected commemorating and naming the 87 people who had been forgotten and nameless for so long — another example of the cemetery serving as a chronicler of Ottawa’s past.

There are also the headstones themselves, a collection of beautiful (and not-so-beautiful) fonts, iconography, architecture and sentiment. Some have curious stories behind them, such as Agnes Wilson’s, who died in December 1939 at 37, before her husband could fulfil his promise to one day buy her a castle. Instead, he did it posthumously, her headstone a castle carved from a large rock.

On most visits, though, I’m content to take it all in without turning it into a history lesson. There’s a large headstone that simply reads “PROPER” on one side. I’ve never checked the opposite side, as I figure it will likely ruin my hope that that’s all there is, like simply an announcement of a proper burial. A little mystery is not always a bad thing.

Meanwhile, with its undulating landscape, crisscrossing paths and preponderance of trees, Beechwood is simply one of Ottawa’s most idyllic spots for walks and early-morning reflection. It’s a favourite of dog-walkers, joggers and those who simply need some quiet. When my kids were youngsters, we’d sometimes just drive through the cemetery at dusk, each lost in our own thoughts.

Consider this Ottawa Citizen report from June 1874, when Beechwood was only a year old:

“The Roman Catholic and Beechwood Cemeteries were visited by crowds of citizens yesterday, desirous of escaping the blinding dust of the streets and enjoying the beauties of nature in this romantic spot. Beechwood Cemetery is becoming a favorite resort on Sunday, and we would advise those of our readers who have not seen the ground to pay it a visit some pleasant afternoon during the present month while the foliage is at its greatest.”

Beechwood is holding numerous events this year in celebration of its sesquicentennial. The next is on March 28, when Ireland’s Ambassador to Canada, Eamonn McKee, will be a guest speaker to talk about the Irish and their roles in making Canada. 

Or you can simply visit anytime,  and learn as much or as little as you want. For the best access and foliage, though, you might wait until the sun has finished melting all the snow.


Wednesday, March 8, 2023

I am zero percent

Chatting coming home from waterpolo last evening, granddaughter Hilary (almost nine) informed me that I was zero percent.  "Zero percent what?" I asked.  "Stupid," she replied.  I burst out laughing!  "I'm also zero," she added.

"Well, what about the rest of the family?"  Running though the other members, all the females in her world came out zero, but the males fared a little worse.  They ranged from one to three percent stupid.  I almost drove off the road laughing, as she proffered her reasons which centred around what she considered dumb things a brother, father or grandfather had done -- or not.  Next she ran through her friends.  Same results by gender.  Her powers of observation are impressive! 

Apparently, all we women are perfect!  What welcome news on International Women's Day!  Speaking of which, it always hits me that Blacks get a month, as in Black History Month; Indigenous get a week, as in Aboriginal Awareness Week; but women only get a day.  Anyone, other than me, notice this?  Here's to us!


Frankly, I wish the whole thing would go away.  We don't need it.

Another day we don't need is National Secretaries Day -- a similar scam.  Notoriously underpaying them, bosses think they can make up for the cash gap with some sort of token gesture one day of the year.  In my experience, it usually involved taking the secretary to a boozy lunch -- also enjoyed by the boss, by the way -- and probably making a pass at the trapped and compromised damsel in the process.  You may think this cynical, but it was true in my world back in the day.  Never having been a secretary, I escaped the horror -- but not the pass-making, which was ubiquitous.  Let's hear it for the put-upon Jills of all Trades!



               

Tuesday, March 7, 2023

Let's get one thing straight

We are all the same race:  The human one.  Everything else is cultural, upbringing and personal decisions.  Colour is just colour, it's not race.  I am stressing this upfront -- again -- because I am going to come down hard on a mother who is taking on the Toronto School Board for subjecting her son to "cruel and unusual punishment" because he was made to sit outside the classroom for bloodying one of his classmates.

The kid who did the bloodying was six and because teachers and school officials can't ignore classroom fights that result in bodily harm, the kid was given what amounts to a "time out".  Remember being made to stand in the hall when you disrupted the class?  Exactly. 

Cue the racist outrage.  The mother then took her fury and wrath to something called the 'Parents of Black Students' advocacy group -- a new one to me, but why am I not surprised?  Naturally, the head of the group went postal, alerted the media and hit the airwaves.  What did the school board do?  Well, of course, they suspended the principal, vice-principal and teacher, thus neutering, knee-capping and blighting their reputations forever.

What is wrong with people??!!  Why is anything that has to do with people of colour automatically "racist"?  If a student transgresses the rules, there must be consequences -- regardless of colour.  But no, if the kid's Black, the immediate reflex is racism.  That should never be, but that barn door was shut long ago.  

This mother, egged on by the head of the advocacy group, actually put a listening device into the jeans of the kid so she could "prove" racism.  Whaaaaaat??!!  You're coaching a six-year-old to spy and mistrust authority figures in the school?!!  What'll that teach the kid?  That all authority must be railed against and not heeded?  Is she raising a future delinquent?  Certainly a distinct possibility, in my view.

"We prefer to believe the child," said the cocky advocacy head when faced with evidence the child had not been not locked in a dark room, as he had claimed, but rather put in the hall.  The question I have is, why do so many people desperately want to come to Canada, mainly Toronto, yet when they settle here, choose to challenge and work against the system, thus undermining what they wanted to benefit from in the first place,.  Then, to top it off, why do they go postal-public?  Their Andy Warhol 15 minutes?

Pierce Morgan had two interesting guests on his feed the other day.  Both Black, one accused Morgan of raging racism because he had called out someone on his behaviour who happened to be Black., while the other, also Black, took the position that not everything is about race; it's about behaviour.  When Pierce challenged the first guest to give concrete examples of where he had been racist, none were forthcoming because there were none.  See, that's what I'm talking about.   

Remember when any trouble you caused at school was automatically your fault?  Remember when teachers were respected members of the community and supported by parents?  The daughter of a friend of mine is a teacher.  She has been subjected to students who pull her hair, slap her, spit on her and disobey on a daily basis.  What do the parents do?  March right into the principal's office and blame the teacher.  (They might want to actually parent, instead of letting violent video games take over.) 

That's just wrong, but it's the norm these days.  Anyone want to be a teacher in rough downtown Toronto?  Didn't think so.  Wouldn't it be nice if classrooms were left to the professionals -- not highjacked by meddling, unqualified, disgruntled parents.  Too bad the tail keeps wagging the dog.






    

     

    


Monday, March 6, 2023

"That's not Santa.....

....that's Mr. Stapley because those are his shoes."  That's what I said to my mother during a kids' Christmas party at our church.  Mr. Stapley was playing Santa, but I didn't buy it.  He may have been dressed up as Santa, but those were his shoes, so that wasn't Santa.  I was about three.  

On another occasion, I was shopping with my Dad when he bumped into someone he knew and stopped to chat.  About six, I stood quietly and listened to their exchange.  "Daddy, that man is so stupid he doesn't know he's stupid," I said when we parted.  Turns out that one holds universally.  I mean, if you're stupid, obviously you can't realize it.  (At six, I didn't have the capacity or empathy to qualify "stupid".  I just used that general word, so don't everyone get offended please.)

Evidently, powers of observation emerge early, which is why I enjoy 'The Behaviour Panel' on YouTube.  These guys analyze every gesture made by public figures and it's fascinating.  Panelists Mark Bowden, Chase Hughes, Scott Rouse and Greg Hartley -- all experts in the field -- pick apart body language, speech inflection, gestures, eyebrow flashes, brow furrows, word choices, wardrobe, hand gestures, foot movements and a million other body movements that give away whether someone is lying or not.

According to their observations, Megan and Harry are evidently huge strangers to the truth.

I have refrained from blogging about these two bores, but when 'The Behaviour Panel' weighed in, my opinions were confirmed.  Harry has been seduced on all levels by Meghan and that's a huge problem because she is behind his thrashing of the Royal Family.  Thrashing the Royal Family means you're thrashing the British government, constitution and the monarchy itself.  You're not just whining about your family, you're attacking a system of government.  Wrong.  

I'm very surprised they have apparently been invited to the coronation because that will turn it from a solemn, religious and holy ceremony to a cheap side show.  Charles should have second thoughts there.   


 

Saturday, March 4, 2023

Why the Leafs can't win

Because they're not a team.  They're a collection of superstars who can't play together.  By contrast, the best hockey player (probably)ever, Connor McDavid, is a team player.  The evidence for this is that Connor has 52 goals so far this season, but 69 assists.  Sixty-nine!  That's how many goals he forfeits so the team can win.  Sadly, they're a sh-tty team, but that has nothing to do with McDavid.  Ya gotta feel sorry for McDavid, who, in spite of his greatness, will probably never win a Stanley Cup with the Oilers, who will never trade him.  

But back to the Leafs, a losing team worth $2 billion.  Mitch Marner, William Nylander, John Tavares and Matthews are each paid gargantuan bags of money, but a team they do not make.  And wasn't Tavares a superstar when he played on the Junior Olympic team?  Yes, but once these guys sign a megabucks professional contract, they quit trying.  Everyone settles into mediocrity and cashes cheques -- McDavid excepted.  B's formula for creating dynamic NHL teams is to pay every player $100 K when they enter the league.  After that, salaries rise for the number of goals, the reverse for goalies.

I ran that scenario by an old journalism colleague from my Maclean Hunter days, who has just retired from 'The Globe and Mail' sports desk, and he wholeheartedly agreed.  "But it'll never happen because they all have agents."  Ah yes, money.  Again.

I'm not a hockey fan, but some stuff I glean through osmosis; B is a big fan and gives me a running narration when games are on and I cannot escape their din.  I am also a devoted fan of Globe sports columnist Cathal Kelly, one of the best writers you'll ever have the pleasure of reading.  That's why I read sports, because Kelly writes about them.  

So, like the Raptors, the Leafs remain mired in defeat and their devoted -- for some reason? -- fans continue to take it on the chin season after miserable season.  The last time they won the Cup?  1967, a 56-season drought that is the longest in the NHL ever.  Me?  I am a Habs fan, but rarely watch because they're sh-tty too.  Can't even find a colour photo of the Leafs winning he Cup, that's how long ago it was:

I grew up watching the original six, so one is spoiled forever.  Those were the glory days of Belliveau, Hull, Esposito, Howe, Horton, Armstong, The Rocket, The Pocket Rocket...I could go on, but you get the drift.  Money has ruined hockey and you can lay that directly at the feet of Gary Bettman -- a New York money boy who probably can't even skate.  

I'm only writing about hockey because Kelly wrote about it this morning and the trade deadline has passed.  The big takeaway for me is that the mulligans afforded the front office guys who run the Leafs remain limitless.  

   

Friday, March 3, 2023

Breathtaking ignorance

I'm talking about the CBC, you know, the public broadcaster funded by the taxpayer.  Had the news on in the kitchen a few minutes ago -- I know, I know, I should not be watching the dreadful CBC, but I was wearying of the coverage of the irrelevant Murdaugh case -- and heard a reporter talking about Charles III's upcoming coronation.  

"Monarchists in Canada are concerned about the lack of announcements about celebration plans for this event," said anchor Lois Lee to a reporter in the field.  "Well," this dunce replied, "Canadians have other things on their minds these days, like the price of food.  So, I think the government is not going to focus on the coronation, or do much about it.  And remember, Charles is not as popular as his mother was."

OMG!  And Lois, obviously as ignorant as the reporter, did not even question him.  

The Monarch is Canada's Head of State!  He cannot be compared to the price of a head of lettuce, or to his late mother's popularity.  The King of Canada anchors our entire system of government.  (See "Canadian Constitution 101", Feb. 21)  He's not just some guy in England who's going to be hosting a bunch of parties in May in Jolly Old to celebrate his crown.  These are the honourable symbols of Canadian government:

This is the direct result of the elimination of civics and history in our  dismal "educational" system.  No one has a clue about how this country functions?!  Yes, yes, I know, it doesn't at the moment, but theoretically.  This is also a direct result of Trudeau's horrific attack on Parliamentary government and his silencing of all MPs.  He has concentrated power in his office, which is now run by the Kids in the Hall and his other drinking buddies.  Duly elected Members?  Who cares.

I hope the 'Friends of the Canadian Crown' and the 'Monarchist League' start to yell bloody murder at this disgraceful state of affairs.  Someone, besides me, needs to start yelling at the top of their lungs.  Someone needs to give the CBC a good public flogging because Charles III is not a head of lettuce.      



Wednesday, March 1, 2023

I have been blogging this forever


The following was written by retired Manitoba judge, Brian Geisbrecht (above), Frontier Centre for Public Policy.   It should be required reading in every university and high school in Canada.  But it won't be.  I highly recommend it to Tanya Talaga, Pam Palmeter, Carolyn Bennett, Marc Miller and Justin Trudeau --  "experts" who dine out regularly on the scam that is the Indian Industry.  Justin, do a little research on what your father and "Uncle Jean" came up with 54 years ago and smarten up.  I also invite all my Indigenous readers and followers to share generously.

__________________________________


Pierre Poilievre recently made headlines when he criticized The Indian Act – calling it racist and archaic. In fact, his remarks were not even controversial, because many indigenous leaders have said the same thing for more than half a century. The Indian Act is indeed a racist anachronism that should have been consigned to the rubbish bin decades ago. No one defends it.

In fact, Indian chiefs called for the abolition of the Act decades ago. This was in the 1960s. The chiefs said that it was shameful that a country that called itself enlightened and progressive could live with itself, while it had an apartheid system that treated Indians like children. They said it kept them in a ghetto.

They explained that most indigenous people lack basics that most Canadians take for granted. They don’t have the education or job skills, too many sit in jails, or are taken as children into child welfare systems, too many abuse alcohol, and live shorter, bleaker lives. In short, too many are part of a chronically unemployed and dependent underclass that lives short, bleak lives, and passes that dismal legacy on to their children.

And those chiefs were right. The Indian Act and reserve system is everything they said it was. Even in the 1960s, there was absolutely no excuse for hanging on to such a disgraceful system – a system that did indeed keep status Indians in a ghetto.

With that in mind, then Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau, and his young Indian Affairs minister, Jean Chrétien, set out to get status Indians out of that ghetto. In their 1969 White Paper, the beginnings of a plan were outlined that would slowly, carefully and expensively, get rid of The Indian Act, and its regressive reserve system.

However, it was respectful of the fact that indigenous people had clearly rejected assimilation. The Paper tried to navigate a third way – that fine line between forced assimilation and continued segregation- finding a path to the needed integration, without forced assimilation.

Specific strategies were suggested. Status Indians would be helped to move into the economic mainstream, with ambitious government programs that promised to let them obtain the necessary education and work skills. In addition, financial and other assistance would be made available to status Indians who wanted to move from uneconomic remote reserves to centres where jobs and careers were available. Eventually, according to the plan, there would be no legal differences between status Indians and other Canadians. Everyone would enjoy exactly the same rights.

Trudeau and Chrétien were proud of the White Paper. Although it was acknowledged to be only the beginning of what would have been – even in 1969 – an extremely lengthy and complicated process, they thought that this was the beginning of a sound plan to get them out of the ghetto.

But when the White Paper was presented, all hell broke loose. The chiefs called the plan that would make their people the equals of every other Canadian “racist”. The reality was that they refused to give up their perks.

This is why an angry Pierre Trudeau told the chiefs “Okay, then stay in your ghetto”. He withdrew the paper, and initiated the indigenous policy that has been basically the same for the last fifty plus years, namely: Send money, and don’t touch The Indian Act.

That is where things sit today. Astounding sums of money are spent maintaining this gilded, but fundamentally rotten ghetto. Politicians pretend to be making significant changes to this stagnant system, with countless expensive government programs. They also humour indigenous politicians by declaring the totally dependent, mostly dysfunctional reserves, to be independent “nations”. Chiefs and status quo and media apologists call any criticism “denialism”.

But nothing has really changed since 1969, except that the money amounts have increased astronomically. Despite the fact that many good people live in those communities, most reserves remain basically dependent human warehouses, rife with corruption and abuse.

And perhaps the most debilitating feature of these ghettos is the culture of permanent victimhood that now plagues reserves. Hysterical conspiracy theories about priests poisoning, murdering, and secretly burying thousands of indigenous children now run rampant in these communities. Reserves are indeed the ghettos that the chiefs correctly described so long ago.

But Pierre Trudeau got one thing wrong when he angrily told the chiefs that they could stay in their ghetto. The chiefs are not in a ghetto at all. They enjoy generous tax-free-salaries and expense accounts. Life is good for them. Neither are many other people who feed off this system- a system indigenous leaders William Wuttunee and Calvin Helin sardonically – but accurately – called “The Indian Industry”.

And lest this last sentence be considered offensive, it should be noted that there are at least as many non-indigenous, as indigenous people, who are dependent on this system. Entire universities, expensive law firms, and legions of indigenous affairs bureaucrats are doing very well because of it.

And they have no intention of letting it go.

There are many reasonable and progressive leaders within the indigenous community who can clearly see how the privileged position of the chiefs depends on the permanent marginalization of the underclass majority. However, those honest voices are drowned out by the majority – the AFN – who refuse to give up the many special perks the system offers them. The money always wins. Their voices are also ignored by reckless writers and activists, who advance their careers by pushing the grievance narrative. True reformers, like Winston Wuttunee and Shawn Atleo, never stood a chance.

So, Pierre Trudeau was prescient half a century ago, when he told the chiefs that the marginalized indigenous underclass majority would continue to live in a ghetto. The dismal statistics that are well known attest to this.

And, the question must be asked: What if those chiefs in 1969 had at least agreed to consider Trudeau’s plan, and work with him to address their legitimate concerns? Would we now live in a country where more indigenous people had integrated into the mainstream, while keeping those parts of their indigenous identity that mattered most to them?

We will never know.