How cute, tying the acceptance of Trudeau's carbon tax to good, ole "climate change". (You'll notice they're no longer calling global warming because it's not.) That's how out-of-it Richard Wagner and five other judges are. They failed to notice that section 92 of the Constitution Act of 1982 gives responsibility for resources to the provinces. I should know because I get my info from B, one of those who held the pen, thus knows it inside out.
So, the feds do not have the jurisdiction to impose such a tax at all. But hey, look how well carbon pricing has done in reducing emissions! Absolutely nothing. It's all just a money grab, period the end.
In all the coverage of this ruling, not one journalist I have read or heard has even mentioned section 92. They just blather on about non-existent climate change. (Read my previous blog to see what a hoax this is. But millions of people are making money out of it, so it continues.) How could the supreme court simply ignore our constitution?! Oh, I forgot. Wagner and Trudeau are McGill old-school-tie buds.
Case closed.
_______________________
I was glad to see someone other than I denouncing Lucki and calling for her to be removed. Native journalist Tanya Talaga wrote a good piece in the 'Globe and Mail' the other day. Of course she aligned her arguments with native issues, but we're on the same page on this file. Lucki is a disgrace to the uniform.
No comments:
Post a Comment